Archive

Archive for December, 2009

Unhealthy habits are what’s killing us.

December 28th, 2009 No comments

http://www.cnn.com/2009/OPINION/12/28/frum.unhealthy.habits/index.html

Unhealthy habits are what’s killing us

By David Frum, CNN Contributor

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
* Americans’ poor health, relative to other countries, is cited as a reason for health reform
* David Frum says there’s little evidence health bill will improve U.S. life expectancy
* He says research shows unhealthy habits explain why Americans get sick more often
* Individual choices to adopt healthy lifestyles would have more impact, he says

Editor’s note: David Frum writes a weekly column for CNN.com. A resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, he was special assistant to President George W. Bush in 2001-2. He is the author of six books, including “Comeback: Conservatism That Can Win Again” and the editor of FrumForum.

(CNN) — Health care reform is proceeding toward the president’s desk, likely to become law in the new year.

Supporters promise the bill will cut costs and extend coverage.

But here’s the real test: What will the trillion-dollar expense of this bill actually buy? Will it improve America’s health? My guess: No.

For all the money Americans spend on health care (60 percent more per person than any other advanced country), Americans are not an especially healthy people.

Life expectancy at 50 in the U.S. ranks 29th in the world, three years behind world leader Japan, one and a half years behind Canada. Other indicators — infant mortality, life expectancy at birth — look even worse.

This poor performance is often blamed on the fact that millions of Americans lack health insurance. But as a recent paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research found, the U.S. — despite its kludgy health insurance system — does a remarkably good job of extending disease-fighting treatment to all.

Authors Samuel Preston and Jessica Ho observe:

* The U.S. screens a higher percentage of women for cervical cancer than any other country in a sample of 15 advanced countries.

* Americans have the highest survival rates for breast, lung, colon or rectal cancer in a sample of 20 advanced countries.

* Compared with Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Great Britain, the U.S. had the third-lowest fatality rate for male heart attack victims ages 40-64, the second-lowest for men ages 85-89 and the best for women aged 85-89.

* Americans 50 and older with heart disease are more likely to receive medication than similarly aged Europeans. Ditto stroke. Ditto high cholesterol.

Cancer and heart disease are not any old ailments. These are the leading causes of death for people 50 and older.

So if the U.S. health system does such a good job saving its middle-aged and elderly sick, why do Americans die comparatively young?

Answer: because Americans are much more likely to get sick in the first place.

And that likelihood owes very little to the health care system and a great deal to the bad choices American individuals make.

If you eat too much, exercise too little, drink too much, smoke, take drugs, fail to wear a seat belt or ignore gun safety, there is only so much a doctor or hospital can do for you.

And Americans do all those things, more than other people.

One-third of Americans are overweight. That one single fact accounts for almost 10 percent of all health care spending. At any given moment, one out of six motorists is unbelted. American children are nine times more likely to be injured in a gun accident than children in other developed countries.

If all Americans quit smoking, if everybody wore a seat belt, if gun owners consistently secured their weapons, if we all drank in moderation and abjured illegal drugs and if the one-third of the country that is overweight would drop the extra pounds, those individual actions would do more to improve health and extend lives than any contemplated by Congress or the president.

Acting on this information won’t be easy: It violates too many taboos. Americans understandably treasure their right to make their own choices, including the choice to super-size it. And many are uncomfortably aware that self-destructive behavior is most often found among the poor and among minorities: Black women are more than three times as likely as white women to be severely obese.

In the near term, public policy can achieve only a limited impact against these problems. There is evidence that youth obesity can be reduced by zoning rules that forbid fast-food restaurants to be sited within 200 yards of a school. More and better gym classes, better cafeteria menus and a ban on soda in schools would all help too.

Over the longer term, we will have to rethink the deeper structure of American food policy: subsidies to corn and soybean growers, the paving over of exurban land that might provide nearby cities with less expensive fruits and vegetables.

Ultimately, though, these are decisions that individuals must make for themselves. In this respect, the present concept of medicalized health care sends some unwelcome messages. By “outsourcing” the concept of health as something that doctors, hospitals and now government do for you — rather than something that depends considerably on your own choices and efforts — we ask the medical system to do more than any medical system can do.

As you consider your new year’s resolutions, remember: better habits will benefit not only your family and yourself — but all your neighbors and countrymen as well.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of David Frum.

[NYTimes] Sen. Grassley Seeks Details on Medical Financing.

December 8th, 2009 No comments

[Jose's Note]

What Sen. Grassley is doing is wonderful and much-needed. Sen. Grassley is also looking into Health IT vendors. http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/10/26/chuck-grassley-has-a-few-questions-for-the-health-it-industry/

Take a look at this letter Sen. Grassley sent to HIT vendors: http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/WSJ_Letter_3M_Company_2009-10-16.pdf

..In addition, it has been reported that HIT/CPOE manufacturers rely on a legal doctrine known as “learned intermediaries,” to shift responsibility for errors in the HIT systems to physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other health care providers. The manufacturers allegedly argue that the health care provider should be able to identify and correct errors caused by the software. It has also been reported that HIT/CPOE contracts with medical facilities may include “hold harmless” provisions that absolve manufacturers of these products of any liability for errors that are allegedly HIT/CPOE system or software failures. These contracts may also include “gag orders,” which prohibit health care providers from disclosing system flaws and software defects.

Furthermore, it was also reported to me that there is no system in place to track, monitor and report the performance of these systems/devices, which could impact a health care provider’s ability to make informed decisions regarding the implementation of an HIT/CPOE system.

…American taxpayers will be investing substantially in the HIT/CPOE industry, and it is important that their monies are appropriately spent on effective and interoperable HIT systems and devices. Accordingly, I would appreciate your response to the following questions and requests for information and documents…

…2) Does 3M include language in its contracts that could be considered “Hold Harmless” provisions? If so, please provide a copy of sample contracts with such provisions.
3) Does 3M incorporate the “learned intermediaries” doctrine in the HIT/CPOE contract? If so, please provide a copy of sample contracts with such language.

[/]

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/08/health/policy/08grassley.html

Grassley Seeks Details on Medical Financing

By GARDINER HARRIS
Published: December 7, 2009

A top Republican senator, Charles E. Grassley, has sent letters to the American Medical Association, the American Cancer Society and 31 other disease and medical advocacy organizations asking them to provide details about the amount of money that they and their directors receive from drug and device makers.

Senator Charles E. Grassley has been studying the influence of drug and device makers on the medical profession.

Such financing amounts are often considered proprietary by the organizations and their directors, but critics contend that the industry’s sway over such groups leads them to lobby on the industry’s behalf.

Mike Lynch, a spokesman for the A.M.A., said the organization had received the senator’s letter and would respond. Mr. Lynch said industry financing made up less than 2 percent of the organization’s budget.

Steve Weiss, a spokesman for the American Cancer Society, sent an e-mail message stating that the society “holds itself to the highest standards of transparency and public accountability, and we look forward to working with Senator Grassley to provide the information he requested.”

Kate Meyer, a spokeswoman for the Alzheimer’s Association, which also received a letter from the senator, said the organization “was going to answer all of his questions,” but she would not immediately say what share of the organization’s financing comes from drug or device makers.

The letter is part of Mr. Grassley’s long-running investigation into the influence of drug and device makers on the practice of medicine. Mr. Grassley, an Iowa Republican, has also long been interested in how charities get and spend their tax-deductible contributions.

“These organizations have a lot of influence over public policy, and people rely on their leadership,” he said. “There’s a strong case for disclosure and the accountability that results.”

Earlier this year, Mr. Grassley sent a similar letter to the National Alliance on Mental Illness. The group told the senator that more than two-thirds of its donations came from the pharmaceutical industry. In response to the disclosure, Dr. H. Richard Lamb resigned from the group’s board.

Dr. Lamb joined the board of the organization in 2005, when he was “shocked to learn that approximately half of NAMI’s income comes from the large pharmaceutical companies,” he wrote in a resignation letter that Mr. Grassley made public. Alliance officials assured Dr. Lamb that the situation would change. “However,” Dr. Lamb wrote, “very little has changed, right up to the present day.” In an interview, Dr. Lamb said that NAMI’s dependence on the drug industry made some actions impossible. For instance, Dr. Lamb said that NAMI should consider warning against the use of some mental health drugs with life-threatening side effects. But Dr. Lamb said the organization could not consider such a move because it could threaten much of its financing.

Michael J. Fitzpatrick, the organization’s executive director, promised that the industry’s share of the group’s fund-raising would drop significantly next year.

Mr. Grassley’s request that organizations provide details about the outside income of directors may cause some consternation. While a few large patient advocacy groups have provided general guidance about their reliance on industry, almost none have given such details about their leaders.

A version of this article appeared in print on December 8, 2009, on page A27 of the New York edition.

= = = = =

[WSJ's HealthBlog] Chuck Grassley’s Greatest Health-Care Hits

http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/12/08/chuck-grassleys-greatest-health-care-hits/

By Jacob Goldstein

Chuck GrassleySen. Chuck Grassley has been following the money in health care for years now. Yesterday, he  wrote to the AMA, the American Cancer Society and a bunch of other nonprofit advocacy groups to ask how much of their funding comes from the drug, device and insurance industries. [See letter at http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/grassley110709.pdf]

The groups, which told the WSJ they plan to respond to the letters, have plenty of company. Here’s a quick list of some of the other Grassley pen pals. (For more, including responses from the people on the other end of the letters, follow the links in the items below.)

* Nonprofit hospitals: Grassley has said some facilities may be “losing sight of the public service that comes with tax-exempt status.” [http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/09/05/sen-grassley-keeps-pressure-on-non-profit-hospitals/]

* Medical Schools: He’s asked questions about industry payments to high-profile docs at medical schools including Emory, Harvard and Stanford. And just yesterday he wrote to UC San Francisco about financial issues.

* The FDA: It looked like a device maker was “calling the shots” at FDA, Grassley said.

* Health IT companies: Among other things, Grassley asked the companies to send him copies of “complaints and/or concerns” that health-care providers have expressed about the systems. [http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/10/26/chuck-grassley-has-a-few-questions-for-the-health-it-industry/]

Drug and Device Makers: On many, many, many occasions.

Easy installers for *free* VistA EMR package.

December 7th, 2009 No comments

If you’re considering purchasing an EMR system make sure you take a look at the VistA package.

“VistA” is the EMR package developed by the Veterans Administration over dozens of years.

Here is an overview of VistA:
http://www.openphi.com/files/OpenPHI_VistA_Backgrounder.pdf

And for the common questions:

* “Isn’t VistA written in MUMPS?” The answer is Yes, and so are many other large EMR systems.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUMPS
“..Large companies currently using MUMPS include AmeriPath (now part of Quest Diagnostics), Care Centric, Team Health, Epic Systems Corporation, EMIS, Partners HealthCare, Meditech, and GE Healthcare (formerly IDX Systems and Centricity). Many reference laboratories, such as Quest Diagnostics and Dynacare, use MUMPS software written or based on by Antrim Corporation code. Antrim, and its parent Sunquest, was acquired by Misys in 2001.”

* “But MUMPS is like 30 years old technology!” Yes, does it make the language less effective than the latest fad programming language? As a point of comparison, FORTRAN is an “old” programming language that happens to run in many mainframes _today_ processing billions of transactions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortran

How to Give VistA a try.

The folks at Astronaut LLC have done a fantastic job bundling all the necessary elements for you to test a full-blown VistA install at no cost and with minimum time and headaches. See:

a.) an easy-to-install server package (http://astronautvista.org/products/astronauttm-vista-server-installer)
Astronaut is an automatic installer for the WorldVistA edition of the Veterans Affairs VistA Electronic Medical Record system. Server rpm and deb as well as Windows client pack. Server is installed so that the Windows client pack clients should work.

b.) a client installer (http://astronautvista.org/products/astronauttm-vista-client-installer)
Easy Windows client installer and session manager that works with Astronaut VistA server installers.

Disclaimer: I have no financial ties to Astronaut. I’m just a passionate advocate of Open Source in healthcare.

Categories: Personalized Health Tags: