Archive

Archive for August, 2009

{WSJ} Burger Chain’s Health-Care Recipe.

August 31st, 2009 No comments

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125149100886467705.html#mod=article-outset-box

* THEORY & PRACTICE
* AUGUST 31, 2009

Burger Chain’s Health-Care Recipe
Paying More for Insurance Cuts Turnover, Boosts Sales and Productivity

By SARAH E. NEEDLEMAN

Four years ago, executives of Burgerville, a regional restaurant chain, agreed to pay at least 90% of health-care premiums for hourly employees who work at least 20 hours a week. Today, the executives say the unusual move has saved money by cutting turnover, boosting sales and improving productivity.

Burgerville’s experience is notable for the food-service industry, where turnover is high and fewer than half of chains offer health insurance for part-time hourly employees, according to People Report, a research firm. The chains that do offer benefits pay on average 49% of the cost for employees working at least 30 hours a week, People Report says.

Michael Vine, left, general manager, and Christopher Phillips, a crew member, at a Burgerville restaurant in Vancouver, Wash.
Read more…

Amid health care debate, Florida lawmakers see rise in contributions.

August 18th, 2009 No comments

On a recent Wednesday morning, 1,000 insurance brokers spread out across Capitol Hill with a singular mission: kill a proposed government-run health care plan.

Among them was J. Hyatt Brown, former Florida House speaker and board chairman of Brown & Brown Inc., a national brokerage firm based in Daytona Beach and Tampa.

..That may be what Brown, the insurance broker who visited her in July, wants to hear. But he insists the financial support of Kosmas – the firm was a big contributor in 2008 – is based on their long friendship and a belief that as a Democrat, she is a good voice in Washington.

“We are involved in the political process,” he said, “and the political process runs on green.”

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/national/amid-health-care-debate-florida-lawmakers-see-rise-in-contributions/1028148

Amid health debate, cash flows to lawmakers

By Alex Leary and Connie Humburg, Times staff writers

Published Sunday, August 16, 2009

WASHINGTON – On a recent Wednesday morning, 1,000 insurance brokers spread out across Capitol Hill with a singular mission: kill a proposed government-run health care plan.

Among them was J. Hyatt Brown, former Florida House speaker and board chairman of Brown & Brown Inc., a national brokerage firm based in Daytona Beach and Tampa.

In a private meeting with his local congresswoman, Rep. Suzanne Kosmas of New Smyrna Beach, Brown pressed the case. “The federal government only does one thing better than private enterprise,” he told her, “and that’s war.”
Read more…

{The Atlantic} How American Health Care Killed My Father.

August 16th, 2009 No comments

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200909/health-care

Policy  September 2009

After the needless death of his father, the author, a business executive, began a personal exploration of a health-care industry that for years has delivered poor service and irregular quality at astonishingly high cost. It is a system, he argues, that is not worth preserving in anything like its current form. And the health-care reform now being contemplated will not fix it. Here’s a radical solution to an agonizing problem.

by David Goldhill

How American Health Care Killed My Father

Illustration by Mark Hooper

Almost two years ago, my father was killed by a hospital-borne infection in the intensive-care unit of a well-regarded nonprofit hospital in New York City. Dad had just turned 83, and he had a variety of the ailments common to men of his age. But he was still working on the day he walked into the hospital with pneumonia. Within 36 hours, he had developed sepsis. Over the next five weeks in the ICU, a wave of secondary infections, also acquired in the hospital, overwhelmed his defenses. My dad became a statistic-merely one of the roughly 100,000 Americans whose deaths are caused or influenced by infections picked up in hospitals. One hundred thousand deaths: more than double the number of people killed in car crashes, five times the number killed in homicides, 20 times the total number of our armed forces killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. Another victim in a building American tragedy.
Read more…

Categories: Fighting for Health, Health IT Tags:

Can a new medical practice style lower Florida’s notoriously high employee costs?

August 12th, 2009 No comments

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/business/content/business/epaper/2009/08/09/a1b_ibmhealth_0810.html

Can a new medical practice style lower Florida’s notoriously high employee costs?

By STACEY SINGER
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Sunday, August 09, 2009

BOCA RATON – Of all IBM’s offices in the United States, none has employee medical costs as high as South Florida.

So on a recent visit to Boca Raton, IBM executive Dr. Paul Grundy of Hopewell Junction, N.Y., pulled in to a cardiologist’s office to test a theory.

“Chest pain,” he said to the receptionist. “I need to see a doctor right away. I have chest pain.”

He was led in to an examining room. Grundy offered a textbook list of symptoms to the doctor which described costochondritis – sore ribs. Treatment? Advil.

Grundy said the doctor wanted an immediate CAT scan of his chest. Grundy objected, saying he’d just had one, and it showed his arteries were in great condition. In that case, the physician said, he needed an immediate cardiac catheterization to find the source of the pain. It’s a hospital-based procedure that involves snaking a probe through veins into the heart.

“I was just an opportunity to make a Mercedes-Benz payment,” Grundy said. “I’m sorry to say that, but it’s true.”

Grundy is IBM’s director of global health care transformation, and he’s on a mission to lower Big Blue’s employee health costs. But more than that, Grundy wants to lead a revolution in how health care is delivered everywhere.

Washington is listening.

Today, Grundy is speaking with President Obama and the director of the White House Office of Health Reform, Nancy-Ann DeParle, about a concept called the patient-centered medical practice.

The latest version of the House health reform bill includes $1.6 billion to advance the patient-centered medical practice concept.

It combines the ideal of the old-fashioned doctor-patient relationship with modern, data-based, electronic patient-management tools. The goal is to get away from “doctors getting paid to do stuff,” Grundy said, and return to a time when doctors knew their patients’ every vice and virtue.

Doctor: System is broken

In the patient-centered model, Grundy’s doctor should know him and his cholesterol so well that Grundy’s chest pain complaint would first raise the possibility that he had over-exerted himself.

The managed care era has divorced doctors and patients to the point where, studies show, most hospitalized patients cannot name their physician. The system is fundamentally broken, he said.

“We’ve discovered the enemy, and it is us; it is me, the employer. It’s how I buy my care,” Grundy said.

Under the patient-centered model, the patient’s primary care doctor becomes the quarterback of their health care team, calling the plays, making sure they’re executed properly.

Grundy insists it’s not managed care as most people experienced during the shift to health management organizations, HMOs.

Patient-centered medical practice pilot projects are under way in the Philadelphia and Denver metropolitan areas, the Mid-Hudson Valley, New York and Rhode Island.

Dr. Dennis Saver, a family practice physician in Vero Beach, wants one in Florida. And soon.

“The incentives in the American medical system are that you get paid for what you do and that’s all,” said Saver, who is a past president of the Florida Academy of Family Physicians.

“So if you do a stress test, or you do an X-ray, or you do a surgery, then you are paid,” he said.

“If you talk to people you get paid a little,” he added. “If you think about what’s going to help your patient be well over the next five years, you get paid nothing at all.”

Under the pilot programs, insurer Aetna is paying primary care doctors between $35,000 and $90,000 each above their normal fees to make the shift. UnitedHealthcare is paying an extra $3 per member per month in an Arizona pilot project, and in other pilots, it’s paying extra for doctors to hire care coordinators, said Eric Sullivan, UnitedHealthcare’s national director for medical home initiatives.

Participation carries cost

Participation in the pilot requires an investment from the doctors: They must be credentialed by the National Committee for Quality Assurance, and they’re urged to adopt an electronic patient record system, which can be a significant investment.

Doctors are coached to use accepted standards to manage disease.

They must demonstrate they’re easily accessible to their patients, whether it’s taking e-mails or allowing walk-in visits.

And they are encouraged to use electronic systems to write and send prescriptions, track tests, and see that patients follow through on referrals and keep up with hospital release advice.

Saver said his electronic record-keeping system cost more than $175,000.

“That major change in technology comes with a price tag, and right now that price tag comes out of your hide as a doctor,” Saver said.

Dr. Donald Liss, who is heading up Aetna’s patient-centered medical practice initiatives, said physicians are making major changes in how they run their practices.

“It’s not good enough to deal with patients when they show up. You have to have a system in place to follow them,” Liss said. “If you send them to a cardiologist, you have to confirm that the meeting happened and find out the outcome. When you prescribe medications, you make sure that’s what the patient is taking.”

Grundy said he began pushing for such a system “literally the day after the Clinton initiative failed.”

Most of the pilot projects are so new that data is still inconclusive on whether they save money.

While there’s an up-front cost for insurance companies, Grundy is convinced that time will show that patient-centered medical practices save money by improving patient behavior, eliminating duplication, and reducing hospitalizations and readmissions.

Liss, at Aetna, is not entirely convinced that patient-centered medical practice will provide less costly care, because they may wind up sending patients to the doctor more frequently. But the concept may well prove it’s providing more effective care and more satisfying care, he said.

“If it results in better health care and doesn’t cost more money, that’s not a bad outcome either,” Liss said.

Categories: Fighting for Health Tags:

{UK} Tories vow to give patients online access to health records.

August 10th, 2009 No comments

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/aug/10/tory-medical-records-plan

Tories vow to give patients online access to health records

Conservatives to unveil proposal for people to access health information online in the same way they can currently access their bank account details

The Conservatives today promised patients “greater control” of their medical records through a controversial plan that would allow companies such as Google or Microsoft to store them online.

The proposal, which would involve patients accessing health information via personal computers in the way they can currently access their bank account details, comes after an independent review of NHS IT commissioned by shadow health minister Stephen O’Brien.

It is also calling for an overhaul of IT provision within the health service, allowing local trusts to choose their computer systems from a catalogue of agreed providers rather than having it provided centrally.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4′s Today programme this morning, O’Brien said: “We want to give patients the ability to give themselves greater control over their information.”

O’Brien will unveil full details of the scheme, which has already been discussed by the party publicly in broad terms, at a news conference later today.

The government’s BP$12bn scheme to computerise every patient’s health records – thought to be the world’s biggest civilian IT project – has been plagued by problems and delays over recent years.

According to the Conservative review, patients could improve communications with their doctors by adding details or share experiences online with others facing similar health problems.

Similar schemes are already used in the United States and Canada, where a local record is also held by the doctor overseeing a patient’s care.

There would be consultation with patients and doctors over the extent to which records could be edited – including the possibility individuals could choose to delete information.

O’Brien said: “Giving patients greater control over their health records is crucial if we are to make the NHS more patient-centred.

“Labour’s attitude to our personal data is misguided. They seem to think they own it and, all too often, they have been appallingly careless in looking after it.

“The government’s monolithic and costly IT system doesn’t involve patients at all. Yet in patients’ hands, health records could do so much more.

“We would have a clearer picture of our health and our care and we would be able to add information to help doctors treat us better.

“This could make a huge difference in helping us understand how to live healthier lifestyles.”

Professor Steve Field, chairman of the Royal College of General Practitioners, said the idea was an interesting one already being looked at by the NHS.

It could be used by epileptics to record when they had fits or people with depression to identify triggers of their condition, helping clinicians, he said.

But health minister Ann Keen questioned how patient confidentiality would be protected.

“The Tories need to make it very clear how their plans will ensure patient confidentiality,” she said.

“We have already set out our plans to give patients greater access to health information, for example through Healthspace, where patients can see their summary care record.”

Last month David Davis, the former shadow home secretary, criticised the proposal in an article in the Times, arguing that it would be a mistake to trust a company such as Google with private information.

Referring to a newspaper report about the plan, Davis wrote: “The policy described was so naive I could only hope that it was an unapproved kite-flying exercise by a young researcher in Conservative HQ.”

But it was David Cameron who first floated the idea in a speech to the Conservative party spring conference earlier this year. Pointing out that the centralised NHS database commissioned by Labour was four years behind schedule, the Tory leader said that his party would have adopted a different approach to the issue of how to improve access to patient records in the internet era.

“We would have said, ‘Today you don’t need a massive central computer to do this,’” Cameron said. “People can store their health records securely online; they can show them to whichever doctor they want. They’re in control, not the state.

“And when they’re in control of their own health records, they’re more interested in their health, so they might start living more healthily, saving the NHS money. But, best of all in this age of austerity, a web-based version of the government’s bureaucratic scheme services – like Google Health or Microsoft HealthVault – costs virtually nothing to run.”

* guardian.co.uk (c) Guardian News and Media Limited 2009

Categories: Health IT Tags:

Games For Health: The Latest Tool In The Medical Care Arsenal.

August 4th, 2009 No comments

http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.28.5.w842

HealthAffairs
TECHWATCH:
04 August 2009

Games For Health: The Latest Tool In The Medical Care Arsenal

Computer-based simulations and interactive programs are introducing a powerful new force into health care: fun.

by Carleen Hawn

ABSTRACT: At the heart of any promising plan to transform the health care system lie two priorities: broader access to care for patients, and deeper engagement in health care by patients. Although the problem of expanding access to affordable care remains unresolved, new tools for deepening consumers’ engagement in health care are proliferating like viral spores in a virtual pond. Digital games, including virtual realities, computer simulations, and online play, are valuable tools for fostering patient participation in health-related activities. This is why gaming is the latest tool in the arsenal to improve health outcomes: gaming makes health care fun. [Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(5):w842-8 (published online 4 August 2009; 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.w842)]
Read more…

Categories: Health IT, Personalized Health Tags: